
Today, the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) quoted the Gospel of John. It seems obvious to me that they were trying to connect their work to the work of Jesus. Unfortunately as has been the administration’s practice, the verse is misused. Those that take the unique salvific role of Jesus and scripture seriously will be disappointed if not disturbed.

I’m not anti-law enforcement, far from it. I was a decorated six-year police veteran in the Metro-DC region. I have served as a law enforcement chaplain for approaching twenty years. I love our law enforcement officers and understand how difficult and costly a vocation it can be. Indeed, today is Peace Officer Memorial Day, and I sorely grieve four friends who died while serving (read “loving”) their neighbors including some neighbors who might not have “deserved” their love through human eyes. Yet, I also understand there can be bad law and poorly executed even corrupt law enforcement. We can fall short. So, this is a nuanced argument I make, but an important one. What might go wrong if we too easily consider ourselves direct instruments of God’s righteousness? The Bible indicates that the answer is a great deal.
If you are not familiar with it, John 1:5 reads (NRSVue), “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overtake it.” Reflecting the wider translation of the Amplified Version (Classic Edition): “And the Light shines on in the darkness, for the darkness has never overpowered it [put it out or absorbed it or appropriated it, and is unreceptive to it].” John is introducing and summarizing his Gospel on a cosmic level. The forces of evil have lost. Jesus’ cross, resurrection, and his ascension has seen to that. Then after this summary, John shares his witness of Jesus in its particulars – the human, historical level.
For those that don’t know or can’t remember the context of the quoted verse, John 1:1-5 makes this explicitly clear:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it” [or “understood it”].
In error, DHS has diminished the meaning of the text. They want to claim that their work is good if not sacred, on the side of the Light of the World who Jesus claims to be. (Even as our nation is not a theocracy, nor only consisting of Christian believers, they regrettably try to use Christian scripture to validate a secular government.) Unfortunately, again, their assertion is explicitly NOT what John 1:5 is about. It’s supposed to be about Christ alone, the Word that was, is, and ever will be, our God who became incarnate. It calls us to worship him, not our works. This is a very inappropriate repurposing of the verse whether for immigration control or something else.
I’m sure some will suggest it doesn’t matter or proves a minor issue. If Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is fighting crime and enforcing immigration laws that is good, why should one care? Well, it can blind us to our own need for repentance. The trouble remains that we are not Jesus. At best, we can only reflect the light.
In enforcement of laws or boundaries, we shouldn’t assume that our work is pure or on point. If Christian, we are called to repentance ourselves. Indeed, even our Constitution suggests this by declaring people are innocent until proven guilty. Through the Fall, even if redeemed as believers in Jesus, we are still sinners. (At least, we Lutherans believe so.) We won’t be in our fullness, similar to but never equal to Jesus, until Resurrection Day. To raise this or any human work to Christ’s level is problematic at best and sin at the worst. In our hubris, we can inappropriately be sanctifying our work that is always imperfect and demonizing people he died to save.
Even as we Lutherans speak about the Two Kingdoms theology of the Reformation in our discernment, we recognize that governments like people can fail even if well intentioned and highly functional. We should not assume they are innately good even as in our humility we should not assume we are innately good. Governments and their agencies should be critiqued and controlled, just as we should be.
I understand that we all need laws. In our Lutheran tradition, our confessions lay out three purposes for the law: 1) a curb to maintain outward order, 2) a mirror to reveal sin and our need for grace, and 3) a guide for sanctified living. Laws, too, are intended to be a gift from God. Yet like the Sabbath, they are meant to serve us, not the other way around. We must be cautious in enforcement and remember that we cannot have justice without mercy.
Here, the scripture adorns video of immigration arrests. At least in Minnesota, some documents allegedly indicated the policy was to be as harsh and aggressive as possible. This agency is still viewed with suspicion as Native Americans and other citizens have been detained, accusations of excessive force and poor conditions in detention are common, and people guilty on technicalities or with illness or disability are held rather than “the worst of the worst” according to the government’s own reports.
Indeed in this video, we don’t know if the people shown are guilty never mind evil. Indeed, humans might do evil and cooperate with it, but even then, Jesus longs for them to know him and repent. Additionally, as I’ve cited before, Jesus says we risk grave sin when we call someone evil and treat them as unredeemable, throw away persons (into hell, jail, or outside our capacity to love). Please recall Jesus’ teaching about anger:
“But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment, and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council, and if you say, ‘You fool [translated from the word, ‘Raca’], you will be liable to the hell of fire.”
Anger is not a sin, but we are not supposed to sin in our anger (Ephesians 4:26). Similarly here, it’s not just calling someone a fool but in one’s heart casting them into the darkness. In our hearts, we might say in judgment, “They are unredeemable. They can’t be saved. They are evil.” This is not how Jesus sees any of us. We might cooperate with evil, act unrighteously, even deny Christ, but still Jesus wants to shine his light on us and make us new. We might resist this, but that’s his hope until our last breath.
As Paul wrote to the church in Corinth (2 Corinthians 5:15):
“And he died for all, so that those who live might live no longer for themselves but for the one who for their sake died and was raised.”
At a time when the President or his administration has misused scripture in social media and speeches for war, depicted the President as Jesus (not a doctor, despite denials), raised a golden idol to the President as boldly as Nebuchadnezzar or a communist despot, and is sponsoring nationalistic Christian rallies when the Church is mean to be universal, no wonder I’m seeing people – even people who voted for the President or support certain policies – suggest it’s bad form or even blasphemy.
Martin Luther argued that only Jesus is the Light. All our works – other human philosophies, religious efforts, and self-made righteousness – can never drive out darkness. Indeed, even in cooperation with the grace offered us or serving the Kingdom, we find that “this little light of mine” is not ultimately ours but a gift given to us through our faith and baptism.
We are children of the Light. We pray that we reflect the Light in word and deed. Yet, we do so only as empowered by God. Let there be no mistake. Don’t accept any inference otherwise too easily. We are not the Light. As created beings, we never can be.
© 2026 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author unless under terms of fair use and properly attributed. Scripture passages when used are from the NRSVue translation unless otherwise indicated.











