Reading the Bible is not the same as understanding it: Approaching “America Reads the Bible” with discernment

I admit that I have enjoyed going to the Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC. I understand peoples’ concerns about its backers’ politics. I’ve read the criticisms over the provenance of certain artifacts, alleged scholarship issues, and an overt Evangelical Christian tone. Some Jewish people applaud it for an emphasis on the Tanakh while others are concerned that the museum is “a problematic mediator” of Jewish religion and traditions. Yet, if one is a discerning visitor, a person aware of these issues who keeps an eye out for interpretive problems and is willing to investigate further, one could still learn a lot of basics about how the Bible, our culture and nation intersect. It can be an enjoyable, informative stop on your tour of the capital.

At the same time, the museum offers plays, programs and speakers. They can host activities of other organizations. There, you might wish to use more caution in your discernment. This museum is private, and therefore, it has the right to push forward certain messaging or facilitate it. Consume that with care. One current example is America Reads the Bible. The foundation behind it is often linked to the troubling if not heretical New Apostolic Reformation which I have written and spoken about recently.

Now, I want to note that reading the Bible can be a very good thing, and reading it publicly can serve as a testimony of one’s beliefs, become an unifying and educational experience, and prove also an invitation for others to come to believe as well. I’ve had friends tell me that participating in public readings of scripture helped increase their own faith. So with the coming of this new event at the museum supposedly marking the 250th anniversary of our nation, I find myself thinking of an historic site near my first congregation. The Historic Polegreen Church in Mechanicsville, Virginia, is dedicated to supporting religious liberty for all.

True, I’ve been gone for awhile, so I cannot speak for today’s practices, but at the time, the Historic Polegreen Church Foundation sought to share scripture and faith in through a lens of religious liberty. They memorialized and educated people about historic events and those connected to this historic congregation like Patrick Henry (who worshipped there as a boy) or an influential religious revival called the Great Awakening. Along with historical markers, the pathway to the historic building’s location (no longer standing) is made of bricks with important dates from religious history. (And yes, of course, Martin Luther is included.) As historic Polegreen Church is often called “ground zero” for the fight for religious freedom, it proves a great space to learn about and discuss the subject.

Thus, the foundation hosts events such as the National Day of Prayer where efforts were made to make sure no one faith took precedence. As we prayed for all spheres of our nation and our government together, no matter what political party, we celebrated the benefits that come with our Constitutional right to exercise religion freely (or not). In the early days of my participation, the local Church of the Nazarene hosted an overnight vigil reading of scripture at the time of the prayer event, but any citizen could participate. Everything connected to the National Day of Prayer at this location was truly a communal, inclusive vent.

Yet noting who reads what passages at such events can also prove instructive. Choices made in presentation and inclusion can profess ulterior motive. And so, be aware that America Reads the Bible, being closely aligned with NAR, likely has a hidden agenda attached – Christian Nationalism and dominionism. These harmful beliefs won’t likely be overtly proclaimed, but that’s what NAR hopes for. Articles about the event might note that it is conservative Evangelical, but many won’t clearly say or understand what is part of the event’s spiritual DNA – bad fruit.

America Reads the Bible is hosted by Christians Engaged, a nonprofit, whose head attended Christ For The Nations Institute (CFNI) which has strong ties to the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). Christians Engaged often interacts with NAR-related personalities, and the founder according to a Google search, participates in a NAR-friendly world. We should put the dots together, and beware, even as they, too, have the right to gather as long as no laws are broken. (Of course, we as citizens have the right to say why we have concerns and where we disagree.)

Fox news proclaimed, “More than 495 Christian leaders, from Washington to Hollywood, will gather for a live event this week to read the Bible aloud from cover to cover.” Fox also reports, “More than 100 faith-based ministries have partnered with Christians Engaged to support the event.” Some of these include leaders and organizations appearing to be closely aligned with or outright supporters of NAR dominionist theology. Still other participants won’t likely even understand the group they said yes to while others won’t care. Yet understand that the leaders will be a small unhealthy slice of overall American Christianity represented including NAR pastors.

The list of readers will be a list that leans unabashedly conservative. This is when the Church is never meant to cozy up to a singular political identity, left or right (thus losing its identity as one people of God) but instead love one another and strive for reconciliation. I’ve read that Democrats were invited, but I really can’t blame them for not responding. With discernment, I think one will see that this event is meant to have a particular message engrained in all that happens. It will be highly orchestrated and slick. The virtues and benefits that come with our freedom of religion will not likely be the primary focus of the messaging surrounding the primary activity. A specific view of a Christian nation will be, and that won’t be necessarily a healthy, biblical view.

Of particular but unsurprising note, President Trump will be a reader for the event, although a pre-recorded one. Many of his spiritual advisors are aligned with or explicitly stated as being part of the loose NAR movement. (NAR is not a denomination.) The passage chosen for or by him is unlikely a coincidence or providence. Within it, there exists a subtle message previously used by Christian nationalists and those favoring theocracy. As a New York Time’s article explains:

The central verse in II Chronicles 7 reads: “If My people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”

“It’s been a hallmark of the religious right to cite this particular passage,” said Matthew D. Taylor, a visiting scholar at the Center on Faith and Justice at Georgetown University.

Biblical scholars emphasize that the passage concerns the writer’s understanding of a particular covenant between God and the ancient Israelites. The books of Chronicles cover centuries of Jewish history, including the reigns of Kings David and Solomon.

Dr. Taylor knows his stuff. His research, lectures and writings focus on American Islam, Christian nationalism, and Christian extremism. Yet what he shares here is basic to proper biblical scholarship and practice. Another scholar I respect is Dr. Brian Kaylor. He agreed on social media, posting, “As I noted in ‘The Bible According to Christian Nationalists,’ that’s a popular passage to misuse.” Even amidst my earliest seminary days, I was clearly instructed to beware applying the Israelites’ unique covenantal relationship and requirements to modern life and politics. It’s not that such passages cannot teach us something, but they primarily address a specific context (the Israelites under their covenant with God).

When we suggest modern applications, we can err. We might forget that Jesus fulfilled the Jewish law and the prophets, and he expanded God’s love through the creation of the Church. It is to be a Church made of all peoples, not just descendants of Twelve Tribes. It is not to force belief but invite. Unfortunately, people have used the passage the President will read to try to shape society into their vision – and not always kindly. We should never assume that requirements necessary for Israel’s growth, mission, and survival (including survival of their faith) are applicable to modern people or times.

The above passage can indeed encourage one to repent (to turn back to God), but in the wrong hands, the passage has been used to promote political agendas or marginalize those a person deems inferior, sinful, or not simply not redeemable. This is not the Gospel. Jesus explicitly forbids it to the Pharisees and all of us. The passage can also be used to boost the Christian Nation myth when our inherited apostolic faith calls us to understand the Church as catholic (meaning universal). Just as Isaiah and other prophets indicate that Israel will be used by God to bless other nations, the Christian scriptures remind us that Jesus came to draw all people to himself.

Certainly, God will use us individually to fulfill some holy purpose, and similarly I think a nation might be used at times. My goodness, Paul writes that God will ensure all things work for the good of those that God loves…even the bad things. For example, Cyrus and the Persians were lifted up as instruments of God’s justice and care by the prophet Isaiah. Cyrus was actually names as a messiah in the original Hebrew (see Isaiah 45:1). And a thorough review of scripture reminds us that God loves the world – its people and all that God created. This doesn’t mean there are never consequences for actions in the real world, or even a necessity for war, but in short, be very cautious when applying such texts as 2 Chronicles 7. One risks becoming not just unbiblical but rationalizing overt sin including abuse and violence against one’s neighbor.

When we begin to see human beings as an anonymous “other” rather than a person loved and being called by God as we are, it becomes easier to move from anger toward hatred and much, much worse as history proves time and again. Indeed, Jesus warns against anger in Matthew 5. In verse twenty-two, he very specifically warns about unrighteous anger, or calling anyone raca or a fool. (Raca is an Aramaic term meaning roughly “empty headed.”) The evangelical site, Got Answers, sums it up nicely:

First, Jesus warns that the very act of murder finds its roots in an angry, murderous spirit: “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment” (Matthew 5:22a). God, who examines the very thoughts and intents of the heart, will issue judgment upon unrighteous anger. Next, Jesus warns against name-calling, using “raca” as an example (verse 22b). Then He issues a third warning against those who call someone a “fool” (verse 22c).

In summary, Jesus explains that murder begins in the heart. How our heart is disposed toward others can misshape our lives and lead us toward harm of others. It is a slippery slope. This is why Luther expands upon God’s command to the people of Israel and on Jesus’ teaching about “Thou shall not murder.” We are all murderers at times as we sin against one another.

Jesus warns about false teachers (Matthew 7:15-16 for example), and Christian supremacists (including those friendly with or espousing NAR theology) might be moving us in the above wrong direction whether they mean to or not. (Trust, some NAR theological adherents explicitly indicate they mean to.) And if we hear their “Christian music,” or read sermons or blog posts, or see memes that echo this theme (subtly or not), or expose ourselves to their well packaged events, without proper reflection, this exposure risks influencing our worldview and gifting their voice with undeserved legitimacy. NAR is often identified as a heretical movement by leaders of Pentecostal, all sorts of Protestant, Roman Catholic and Orthodox bodies, so be on guard. They aren’t Evangelical in the truest sense of the term. In fact, using that term to identify their beliefs gifts them with more unwarranted, if not dangerous, legitimacy.

I believe deeply in the values that come with freedom of religion, but it comes with risks. No religious person should be imprisoned because of their faith – even heretical or harmful faith – unless they violate the law or are hurting themselves or others. And I am not asking they be persecuted or cursed. (Although, NAR adherents commonly utilize imprecatory prayers against those who disagree with them.) Yet be cautious and intentional in engaging such events, teachings, or worship. By lifting up our nation in such an unbiblical way, we tend to subjugate and demean others. In response, we need not become aggressors. We can seek to share the Gospel as Jesus taught us and invite others to see and follow a different way than the powers of this world offers us.

Through the Bible, we have been told that our Kingdom is not of this world, and we do not need to act or react in worry. We are only asked – in both the Jewish and Christian scriptures – to trust as we love our neighbors as ourselves. And if we fail, we can be forgiven because of what Jesus’ has already done through the cross. Our repentance ultimately becomes a sign of our thanksgiving for a God who loves us and all peoples first – before we even knew of God.

That’s ultimately a very different message than either Christian nationalism or NAR offers. The Gospel speaks of Christ’s yoke that is easy and light, not their political manipulation, strong arming, and sinful pride. It is the gentler but certain message and promise that I hope all people will come to hear.

© 2026 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author unless under terms of fair use and properly attributed. Scripture passages when used are from the NRSVue translation unless otherwise indicated.