Tag Archives: parable

Who’s the boss? (Sermon)

Image reposted from St. Tikhon Orthodox Church, Caroline County, VA

The readings for the 17th Sunday After Pentecost, Yr. A were: Jonah 3:10—4:11; Psalm 145:1-8; Philippians 1:21-30; Matthew 20:1-16. This sermon was preached at Grace & Glory Lutheran Church in Palmyra, VA on September 20, 2026.

Another election cycle is upon us. Oh, yeah! If you aren’t aware of it, early voting in Virginia began on September 18. If you have not done so, the National Council of Churches (of which we are part of through the ELCA) asks us to please take two minutes sometime soon to check that you are registered and verify your information so you can fully participate. And for Lutherans, that’s very important theologically. We hear and understand a call from both our Jewish and Christian scriptures that we are to pray for the welfare of the land where we are in exile (see Jeremiah 29:7). We are to also actively participate in the life of our community to better love our neighbor (especially those overlooked and in need). And we are also to help our imperfect government (Martin Luther called it the left hand of God) maintain peace, order, and justice as best we can.

That said, I can understand if you aren’t much in the mood to talk politics or struggle with hope these days. You might wish to hold your nose and vote. For we are a generation seemingly stuck in the grist mill of corruption, ongoing caustic conflict, and sour divisions. As some studies suggest, our nation has become more radically divided than since perhaps the Civil War. Then according to 70-year tracking by the Pew Research Center, current trust levels in our government hover around 17% to 27% depending on the specific phrasing of the survey and the government system being discussed.[i] The faceless nature of social media and the selfishness of some political authorities only makes things more insulting, aggressive, and hurtful. It can make one exhausted.

Yet, I am not sharing this in order to tell you how to vote. That’s for you to prayerfully discern. Still, I do think this very real struggle is instructive to our humanity and how we should live as Church. We are to reject the way of the world even though in the world.[ii] We are to love God, our neighbor, and, as stewards of creation, all that God created. We are to love as God has loved us, for we, too, in our sin, faults, and failings, have acted at times as enemies of God. And yet, God loved us always. Jesus died and rose for us. And the Spirit through our faith and baptism still works to sanctify us despite our struggles with sin.

In a past election cycle, a seminary friend of mine posted a startling if not controversial image on Facebook. It was a picture of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump together…both smiling. On it was posted the words, “These people are made in the image of God. Both of them. Yes. Both.”[iii] Well, you can probably imagine the guffaws and less than polite commentary that resulted. This included rants from anonymous sources and likely some bots.

Yet, it remains true! Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, you, me, and any other fallible, miserable, or corrupted by sin human being that we can think of in our world…even the person or persons who most irritate us or prove the enemies of all that is good…or “the worst of the worst,” citizen or not…they are created in God’s image. And this should serve as a caution to all of us as Christians no matter our political bent. Do not be quick to judge. Do not let our hearts close to them even as we struggle if not fight for justice. Treat them with mercy, for God loves them too and wants better for us all.

Indeed, the Ten Commandments call us toward mutual love in community with God and neighbor. The prophets demand justice in God’s name which is impossible without mercy. We must temper our gossip and lies about others even if on social media. Martin Luther argued that to fulfill the commandment on bearing false witness, we should try to frame the actions of others in the best way possible. And when there is seemingly no best way? Well, counselors of this day and across wisdom literature of many ancient cultures suggest we consider how these people we struggle to love got that way. How has their upbringing, traumas, losses, or whatever impacted their decision. This might not limit repercussions. It doesn’t erase error or fix everything, but that attempt hopefully softens our hearts. Even in praying for our enemies, we might open our hearts a bit more to love as God loves.

Once again, I want to remind you that Jesus taught (Matthew 5:22) that calling others raca (the Aramaic word for worthless, good-for-nothing, or empty headed) is a grave sin.[iv] That ends up being consequence of the yoke of the pharisees, a biblical metaphor for legalism, self-righteousness, and the crushing burden of strict religious rules.[v] The Pharisees could have the tendency to think non-Jewish people or those struggling with grave sin were irredeemable. As Jesus unpacks the Beatitudes for us, he explicitly cautions that such attitudes puts us at risk, for murder begins in our hearts.  

In response to this biblical call, the image my friend posted was created by a movement called Election Day Communion. Started by Mennonites but now ecumenical, it promotes the sharing of communion on election days since 2012. The founders of this movement remind us, “We are one in Christ, no matter what we vote.”[vi]  

Where offered, Election Day Communion is a chance to remind ourselves that our allegiance to Christ is higher than allegiance to any party or political campaign. By gathering with neighbors, we can encounter the power to truly change the world. It is not found not in politics, or presidents, or protests, but in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.

Today, we see similar struggles undergone by the prophet Jonah. Through the complete tale, we hear of pagan sailors turning to God for redemption and aid. We hear of a pagan city turn to God in repentance. And we hear of a prophet, chosen by God, unwilling to follow God’s requests if it means we must love our enemies. And while Jonah understands his prophetic message from God that Ninevah be “overthrown” in a violent sense, the Hebrew word for overthrown as used in the passive or reflexive participle can also mean “overturned” in the sense of changed or transformed.[vii] Jonah expected only judgement. God willed inclusion, transformation, reconciliation.

Of all the people in the Book of Jonah, it is Jonah the prophet who turns from God and runs. Others including his enemies turn toward God. And when God relents against Ninevah, Jonah not only questions God’s decision, but Jonah grows angry. After all he went through, why did God let the city survive? As Professor Neal Walls writes, “Our anti-hero takes phrases from what is perhaps the most theologically programmatic description of the God of Israel in Exodus 34:6–7, which extols God’s compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and steadfast love, and throws them in God’s face as an accusation rather than praise.”[viii]

Did you catch it? In the text, Jonah argued scripturally that he knows that God is a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love, and relenting from punishment (Exodus 24:6-7), but then as if not understanding the words he just spoke, he accuses God for not destroying the city. Jonah profanes the description of God as love and misinterprets God’s purposes as he wills.

The people of Nineveh were a dreaded enemy of the tribes of Israel, worshippers of a foreign God, defilers of what was deemed sacred. They had likely murdered or betrayed people that Jonah knew. Righteous anger might be understood in such a situation. The dispensing of harsh justice might be appropriate. Yet rather than offering grace as he has received released from some sort of giant fish or whale, Jonah developed hate for them in his heart. He wished for their murder and total destruction.

Fortunately for Jonah and for us, God’s mercy is deep and wide. We are blessed by the ironic reality that grace is not fair…Hear it again and understand, grace is not fair. God showed the people of Nineveh a second chance they did not deserve just as God gives us that chance through our faith and baptism. And as Jonah began to lick his wounds and pout, God did not give up on Jonah either. God patiently tries to explain things to the prophet, although no explanation is owed from our Creator.

While Jonah mourns the loss of the bush offering him shade, God has compassion on the hundred and twenty thousand residents of Nineveh and their animals, too.[ix] The residents don’t know their right hand from their left, and so God reaches out to them – to show them mercy and embrace those who had been lost.

And this same theme resounds among Jesus’ last words when he dies on the cross for us. He prays for his abusers and those who abandoned him, “Father forgive them. They know not what they do.” Sadly, sin can be so subtle, insidious, and self-justified, that this is often the case. People do not know the right hand from their left…We do not know what we are doing. We come to call evil good and rationalize sin (as the people in the Book of Judges).

With the election upon us, we have many lessons we can learn from Jonah and the Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard. Perhaps the most important thing is to remember that we aren’t the boss. God created each of us with a unique purpose – some important in the eyes of the world, some smaller purposes, some won’t be recognized until with are with Jesus, yet all matter to God. God’s ways are too wonderful for us; to lofty to attain, says the Psalmist.[x] So in the end, God can save whomever God wants; judging with both perfect justice and mercy framed by hesed, loving kindness.

In a world where our understanding of Christian baptism is so often used as a dividing line if not centrifugal force pulling Christians apart, we were urged to see baptism as it was intended…a centripetal force, pulling us (sometimes against our will) toward the centrality of Christ…pulling us inward toward relationship with one another.[xi]

Just before Jesus shared his parable about the Laborers in the Vineyard, he said that with God all things are possible when it comes to salvation –  the last can become first, or the greatest sinner become the most honored of saints. In Matthew 20, landowner is literally “master of the house.” And as master of the house of Israel, our Triune God is the boss. If Jesus wants to include gentiles and sinners, his disciples are asked to follow his lead.

And for us, whatever happens, we don’t have to fear for the future of the Church. Islam and other faith traditions, perceived enemies, and all those different from us need not have power over us unless in fear and anger we give it to them. We can seek to treat them justly with loving kindness even when laws must be enforced. We are free to splash in our baptismal waters; trying to love even our enemies rather than drowning in our fears.

Yes, Jonah the prophet was a stubborn, old fool in many ways. And as we face our political divide, business decisions, family tensions, and yes, even life in the church, we can be too. Yet, it isn’t too late for us to learn. It is possible for us to stop our running away to turn toward God and live. And this love turns us toward our neighbors – all of them. As we go into our voting booths, or businesses, or clubs, or schools, I pray we hear Jesus’ words in our minds and our hearts, “A new command I give you. Love one another, as I have loved you.”  God has chosen to love all that God created, and since God’s the boss, we should strive to do so as well. Amen.


[i] Pew Research Center (December 4, 2025). Public Trust in Government: 1958-2025. Downloaded at: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/12/04/public-trust-in-government-1958-2025/ on September 18, 2026.

[ii] See John 17:16.

[iii] Election Day Communion (November 2016).

[iv] Bible Study Tools (u.d.). Raca. Downloaded at: https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/raca/ on September 18, 2026.

[v] Got Questions (2026). What does it mean when Jesus says, “My yoke is easy and my burden is light” (Matthew 11:30)? Downloaded at https://www.gotquestions.org/yoke-easy-burden-light.html on September 18, 2026.

[vi] Election Day Communion (November 2016).

[vii] Wall, N. (September 2026). Commentary on Jonah 3:10—4:11. Working Preacher. As downloaded on September 18, 2026 at https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-25/commentary-on-jonah-310-411-5.

[viii] Ibid.

[ix] Ibid. As Neal Walls explains, “The New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition translation of the verb as ‘concern’ in 4:10–11 misses the nuance of the Hebrew, which really means ‘to pity’ or ‘to have compassion.’”

[x] See Psalm 139:6-11.

[xi] This comparison was read or heard somewhere in my life, but sadly, I cannot give an appropriate citation. I apologize.

Below, please find a video of our worship service. The sermon starts at about the 27:09 minute mark.

© 2026 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author unless under terms of fair use and properly attributed. Scripture passages when used are from the NRSVue translation unless otherwise indicated.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Living Parables (Sermon)

The readings for the 9th Sunday After Pentecost, Yr. A were: 1 Kings 3:5-12; Psalm 119:129-136, Romans 8:26-39; Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52. This sermon was preached at Grace & Glory Lutheran Church in Palmyra, VA on July 26, 2026.

Field Mustard in bloom, also known as Brassica Rapa, or by the alternative older name, Cruciferae, meaning “cross-bearing” (Detail). Image by: P.M. Dzuik at Minnesota Wildflowers.

You might not yet know this about me, but I love mustard. No, I mean really love it. If you look inside my fridge, there are twelve distinctly different varieties of mustard at this moment. Overtime, they change regularly, but I am never without several choices. When traveling in the Midwest, I was compelled to stop at the National Mustard Museum. And on the first Saturday in August, it is a safe bet that I will mark the National Mustard Day somehow. (And yes, National Mustard Day is a real thing.)

During my last year at Christ Lutheran, the youth ministry held a National Mustard Day Pool Party. The youth really got into it. We had mustard tastings, mustard inspired dishes, and many of the youths wore yellow without prompting because they bought into the passion and excitement I shared – at least for that day. It was a wonderful day with many memories made, and my love of mustard became sort of a lasting joke among us. Some have sent me cartoons since I left picturing me with them and, of course, mustard.

And then this year, God surprised me with another gift. Standing almost five feet high, one stalk of field mustard now grows in my back garden. I didn’t plant it. I’ve not seen that species anywhere in my neighborhood before. It just suddenly appeared. And although farmers tend to consider it a weed, I have learned that one can eat it as mustard greens or make a kind of mustard out of it. I consider its appearance a kind of miracle. Why? Because to me when I look at it, it brings me joy reminding me of mustard, but also past trips, youth formally entrusted to my care but whom I still deeply love, and in no small part, today’s Gospel.

Yet, the Parable of the Mustard Seed is not the only one we hear this morning. In a kind of rapid-fire succession, the lectionary asks us to consider five, very short parables uttered by Jesus. In Jesus’ presentation, one commentary writer, Zina Jacque, compares Jesus to a comedian working the room.[i] Different verbal tidbits are thrown to the crowd hoping that something lands well. The comedian knows that the audience is made of varied people with unique experiences, and so the illustrations used vary to hopefully help different segments of the crowd relate.

Remember, parables can be stories, sayings, or riddles. They might even seem humorous at times. During Jesus’ earthly ministry, parables were used by all kinds of teachers to land a desired lesson…to help their students critically think, learn, and remember. Similarly, Jesus wanted to connect to his original audience and to us.

In detail, Zina Jacque argues this is exactly what Jesus is doing in his teaching and preaching. The repetition is intentional. First, “The mustard seed and the yeast (verses 31–33) speak to those who know the land and the kitchen.”[ii] Meanwhile, “The hidden treasure and the pearl (verses 44–46) speak to those who understand acquisition, risk, and the marketplace.”[iii] Last but not least, “The dragnet full of fish (verses 47–50) speaks to those whose livelihood depends on the sea.”[iv] And I think it is kind of appropriate that this last parable was offered to the Apostles when alone. For as scholars suggest, at least four and up to seven of Jesus’ Apostles were likely fishermen.[v] He tried to connect with them.

Yet despite the variations, she also notes, “no matter which parable grabs your attention, the point remains the same. “The kingdom of heaven is valuable beyond measure, it is at work even when you cannot see it, and it will cost you everything to participate in it fully.”[vi] As humans, we can only get a sense of such wisdom…We taste and but don’t fully see yet what the inbreaking Kingdom has in store.

Still, we might often catch glimpses through the smallest of things…the ordinary…often imperfect things in our eyes. For example, in a central parable of the five, we hear of leaven being worked into flour in order that it might grow, expand, and become the bread that is intended. That, too, is intentional. And, leaven is often used in Matthew as a negative symbol for the teaching of the Pharisees.[vii] “Beware of the leaven,” we are cautioned.

Yet as with last week’s wheat and weeds (Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43), the parable’s leaven is worked into God’s good will for us. Jesus elsewhere says he did not come to abolish the Law but fulfill it. He draws his own teachings from the Law, the Prophets, and the Wisdom literature of Judaism and expands upon it as only God can do. In our Bible study last Wednesday, it struck me that the Jewish image for Wisdom or God’s Spirit was a woman. Perhaps, true wisdom is partly understanding and trusting that all things, even evil things or our own sin, can be used by God in the end to bless us just as Paul argues (Romans 8:28).

Yet always remember that with the Resurrection and ascension of Jesus, the Kingdom is here…not in its fullness yet, still breaking in, but here. In the small neighbor children whom I saw playing with abandon a few nights ago, or through the relationships we might have (particularly perhaps in the Church), and in our gardens or on our daily walks (including our vocational walks), or in the lowly Field Mustard in my backyard…we can witness and learn about the inbreaking of the Kingdom at work within us and around us. Even amidst the leaven, weeds, or any bad, the Kingdom is here and yet still coming. So, we are to watch and wait with expectation and hope.

In Psalm 46, speaking for God, we read, “Be still, and know that I am God.” This use of “still” (raphah) means to stop stiving or let go (“let go and let God”) in Hebrew. It is an invitation to experience God’s sovereignty and love…to witness God’s grace at work. And that is what Jesus is doing with these parables. Stop, contemplate, listen…In modern psychology or other faith traditions, we might say “be mindful.” We who are faithful are to rest and act in a kind of conscious or intentional love. “Abide in my love,” rest in my love, Jesus invited us before he died.

Similarly, in seminary, I was exposed to the writings of Therese of Lisieux. As Therese died from tuberculosis while a young nun, she likened her experience to that of a small butterfly. Even as she did things to help her health, she saw her soul like that time creature entirely dependent on God’s grace to carry her to heaven …the grace now available to us in the Resurrected Christ.

She came to call herself, the Little Flower, as she saw that she was like a hidden wildflower in God’s garden rather than a grand plant. Even from her sickbed, she could serve God through her prayer and faithfulness. Easily overlooked, even in her suffering, she trusted that she mattered to God.

Also, she compared herself and her budding faith to being like a small bird with untried wings looking up at the sun with profound and total confidence. She knew who she belonged to. She would mindfully go through her day looking for signs of God’s Kingdom of love and grace breaking in all around her. She would keep watch and stay awake as Jesus taught.

Today, she is commonly known as the Little Flower, and many people seek to model what she called her “Little Way,” a way of holiness…ultimately Christ’s way. She came to believe that by doing small tasks and performing her duties with great love she was fulfilling her calling within the Kingdom. Heroic feats were not mandatory…are not mandatory. This reminds me of quotes from Mother Therese in Calcutta, but it is also the wisdom shared by Martin Luther. He, too, argued three centuries earlier that in living out our vocations we can make Christ known. He wrote that in the smallest acts done with great love we serve Jesus. Even the diaper changing of a baby when done in love, he suggested, becomes a sacred act…a holy moment.  

Thus, the Kingdom of Heaven is not like the human ideas of power, might, nor significance. We are already significant to the God who made us, the Son who died and rose from the dead for us, and the Spirit who lifts our hidden prayers as with groans. In God, we find the fullness of our significance no matter our station or our lot, nor even our ongoing struggles with sin. We cannot be loved more than we already are despite living imperfectly in an imperfect world.

Sadly, since the 1970s at least[viii], the United States Church has been obsessed with growth models related to size, and yet with seventy percent of congregations worshipping at less than 100 people, maybe growth in numbers isn’t the point of our ministry? In the Kingdom’s economy, faithful witness is what matters…no matter the challenges or whatever dangers we face…no matter alone we might seem…even facing our own death. And as Christian denominations and persons tend to struggle and argue over the merits of cultural domination versus cultural accommodation,[ix] maybe we are getting it wrong there, too? That might not be the battle the Kingdom calls us to wage at all.

I like how a former Bible professor of mine, Professor John T. Carroll, summed up the hopeful message that these parables provide us:

“Jesus and the disciples carry out their mission in a world that includes a whole lot of bad. Yet even though God’s reigning presence will not swiftly cancel and eliminate the brutality of Roman armies (to name one example), people of faith can trust the future to the holy justice of God. The parable in 13:47-50 summons readers today to the same courageous trust.”[x]

Now, I could be wrong, but perhaps we who believe are to live more like the humble Field Mustard in my backyard after all. We won’t always be appreciated. We are sometimes forced to live amidst rocky soil or battered by storms. And yet, we each have a purpose that’s special to God. We become a kind of living parable for others to help them understand just a little bit more about the Kingdom of God at work in the world and Jesus’ own call to them in their lives.

Yes, some might see us to be beautifully within this special “mustardy family” we call Church despite our imperfections. That botanical family is a family traditionally known as Cruciferae, which means “cross-bearing” in Latin. For their four petals form a cross when in bloom. This reminds people of Jesus. And through our own crosses born in faith with God’s help, God will surely make us bloom. People can see Jesus in us. And just as Jesus bloomed in his resurrection, we too will fully bloom when his Kingdom comes in its fullness. That’s God’s promise to us. Amen.


[i] Jacque, Z. (July 2026). Commentary on Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52. Working Preacher. As downloaded at https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-17/commentary-on-matthew-1331-33-44-52-7 on July 24, 2026.

[ii] Ibid.

[iii] Ibid.

[iv] Ibid.

[v] Harris, M.D. (March 12, 2025). Why Did Jesus Choose So Many Fishermen to be His Disciples? MD Harris Institute. As downloaded at https://mdharrismd.com/2025/03/12/why-did-jesus-choose-so-many-fishermen-to-be-his-disciples/.

[vi] Jacque, Z. (July 2026). Commentary on Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52.

[vii] Card, M. (2013). Matthew: The Gospel of Identity. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press. p. 110.

[viii] Holy Post Media (July 22, 2026). Holy Post Podcast: The Idolatry of Church Growth with Andrew Root. Episode 730.

[ix] Bell, J. (July 2, 2026). The End of Christian America: What Actually Killed American Christianity. Livewell. As downloaded at https://jamesbell333289.substack.com/p/the-end-of-christian-america-227?r=6utlc2&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true on July 22, 2026.

[x] Caroll, J.T. (July 2023). Commentary on Matthew 13:1-9, 18-23. Working Preacher. As downloaded at https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-15/commentary-on-matthew-131-9-18-23-6 on July 23, 2026.

Below, please find a video of our worship service. The sermon starts at about the 21:33 minute mark.

© 2026 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author unless under terms of fair use and properly attributed. Scripture passages when used are from the NRSVue translation unless otherwise indicated.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Who’s dressed properly for communion?

Source: Diabosik on Pixaby. Used by Permission.

For those who attend our theology on tap meetings, Three Priests Walk in a Bar, you might recall that we originally created a special Facebook group so conversations could continue. Our producer and facilitator, Nick2, similarly invited folks to “pick apart” our gatherings conversation at a later date. We invite you to join our Facebook group and join the ongoing conversations related to our gatherings and podcasts. Here’s the second of two essays that I am sharing regarding the Lord’s Supper in response to issues raised. The live event’s topic was “Can Christians Worship Together or Not?,” Episode 3.

When I was a child long ago, it was a common practice to have those coming to the Lord’s Table for the first time to dress in white. It was to serve as a reminder of our baptism. Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, both means of God’s grace, are intricately linked almost as if one sacrament. Fr. Adam (Orthodox), Fr, Nik (Episcopal) and I (Lutheran) agree on that understanding.

As our last live gathering came to a close, Father Nik offered last words, passionate and extensive ones, in defense of common liturgical practice and Apostolic tradition: the unbaptized should not receive communion. I can’t say I explicitly disagree with his argument. Nor is it the first time that I’ve heard it. Yet, I do wonder about the certainty of his biblical interpretation, particularly as it comes to the Parable of the Wedding Banquet (Matthew 22:1-14). God might surprise us yet.

Fr. Nik, as many others before him, argued as if the meaning of the parable is both clear and specific. (At least to my ear, that’s the way I heard it.) One of those guests let in to the wedding banquet had refused to wear the appropriate wedding garment to the feast. Traditionally, such wedding garments were provided by the host, much as baptismal candidates were presented a white robe upon their baptism to remind them of their now being clothed in Christ. Many see the wedding banquet, an End Time symbol when we will live in the fullness of God, as also representing the Lord’s Supper, “a foretaste of the feast to come.” So, the argument goes, our faith and Baptism (the grace-filled garment) must be worn to the feast (the Lord’s Supper).

I accept the tradition and polity of the historic Church as understood by the ELCA. We do save communing for baptized members of Christ’s Church. Yet, I think it immensely important to point out (but we did not have the time to do so at our gathering) that parables are teaching stories. In Jesus’ time, they were commonly riddles and short stories used as a tool by instructors of all kind. They are meant to be wrestled with and often can have multiple answers and meanings. Despite the apparent certainty of Fr. Nik’s argument, isn’t it possible more is going on here? Isn’t it possible he (and others) have misapplied it to fit their already held liturgical and religious dispositions? What else could God be saying?

Certainly, there is no one way to understand this famous parable and its component pieces. Yes, as mentioned above, baptismal garments were offered the newly baptized (who entered the waters naked) to reflect our “putting on” Christ, our rebirth and regeneration – at least in a number of communities. Yet, that practice only became a norm after Jesus’ resurrection. In the scriptural account, Jesus was speaking to a crowd who would not necessarily make such a connection, even though later Christians might. In this point of his ministry, most of the original audience would likely have interpreted Jesus’ parable through the lens of Jewish scriptures and experience.

If you side with some scholars that argue the story might reflect later teachings of the community of Matthew, you might be assuming a great deal. Even with each Gospel witness being somewhat different, sometimes quite different, I’ve not been convinced by anyone that the writers played with Jesus’ central teachings freely to better fit their specific geographic, cultural context or the current theology. Jesus certainly could have intended elements of the story for future disciples, but that too, is hard to prove. It might be best to look for allusions and connections to the Jewish scriptures; something Jesus’ original audience (and the original audience of Matthew’s Gospel who are widely thought to have been Jewish Christians) would be familiar with. Let’s consider what he is saying to them, and that might help us make better applications today.

In Genesis 3, God made garments of skin to cover Adam and Eve, a sign of God’s grace amidst their rebellion. There are many instructions and commands regarding the use and care of religious garments in the Jewish scriptures. Garments could reflect one’s tribe and one’s purpose. In the Psalms, God’s loving activity and light is often compared to a garment. And the prophets speak of putting on the Lord’s splendor like a garment. So, the original listeners could have made many complimentary interpretations while excluding any particular allusion to Baptism or the Lord’s Supper.

Many argue that the garment at some level represents God’s love, grace, protection and works. It defines who we are and who we trust in through faith; faith itself being a gift. The garment in this parable need not be explicitly or solely connected to Baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Indeed, many scholarly and historic interpreters do not limit it in such a way. One modern Orthodox resource alluded to Baptism, but more so, the author argues we will be examined at the End of Time to see if we have shared in a life of repentance within the Church (in their mind, the Orthodox Church alone). Did we desire and accept God’s mercy? It isn’t so much about the Lord’s Supper as much as it is about our entire lives lived in faith within the holy community. Explicitly, the author asked, “Have we lived in the light we have been given?” Perhaps that proves a better understanding of the passage.

Indeed, Pope Gregory the Great argued in a sermon that ultimately the garment is God’s love. “[Jesus] came as a bridegroom to unite Himself to the Church. There was no other means than God’s love by which the Only-begotten could unite the souls of the elect with Himself. This is why John tells us: God so loved the world, that He gave His only-begotten Son (John 3:16). He who came to men for love’s sake, calls this love the wedding garment.” To him, this garment has two threads: the love of God and neighbor. As Jesus taught and recorded in Matthew, this is the greatest commandment. This doesn’t necessarily exclude one referencing the Baptism or the Eucharist, but that explicit connection seems a bit forced if Gregory the Great’s argument and many others like it hold true. Indeed, the Jewish foundation of Matthew’s Gospel might promote the greatest commandment being the preferred interpretive lens over any sacramental focus.

So, is it wrong for Fr. Nik and others to use this parable to defend the sanctity of the Lord’s Supper and how we should participate? I don’t think it necessarily is so, but there is a need for caution. It appears this parable might primarily be aimed at something quite different – a simpler application. Trust or faith in Jesus Christ might prove the preferable focus. Love and grace in light of “the fulfillment of the law” might serve as a better, more direct interpretive key. The parable might even be best understood as a warning for Christians not to take their salvation for granted as in Bonhoeffer’s arguments against “cheap grace.” Yet if one believes it to be primarily about Baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and the risk of being cast out for receiving the Lord’s Supper improperly (without being baptized, or while being ignorant or ill prepared) then there remain important questions to be addressed.

Does this mean only those who are baptized or who died as martyrs are saved? If someone receives the Eucharist in error or with bad intention or practice, are they without hope? Would that be a mortal sin? (As Roman Catholics understand it, this is a sin that leads to damnation if not confessed and repented of, but Lutherans reject such a hierarchy of sin. All sin separates us from God and one another.) Can faith be enough to save us, even the faith of those who are not yet baptized for whatever reason? Could not God choose to save those who are unbaptized whether infants or those who have not heard of Jesus yet for extenuating circumstances, even as we remain certain that through our faith and participation of the Sacraments we are saved by grace?

And what about those who have had members of the Church act as stumbling blocks to the faith, keeping the “little ones” who would otherwise believe away from Jesus, the Church and the Sacraments? In this last case, one might recall Jesus’ comment that it would be better to die with a millstone around one’s neck and be cast into the sea than be the one who kept the “little one” away. The sin appears to be on those who keep people away from Jesus, not those who are kept away (Matthew 18:6-9). There exist people historically and today who have been kept away from Christian faith through individual abuse and poor witness as well as the corporate power and influence of political and family systems in the Church. If we share in that sin as part of the Church or explicitly, does that mean we will found naked at the feast? I trust from the promises of Christ that will not be the case for us, and I suspect greater grace will be offered to others “outside” the Church than many Christians expect.

In the West (and perhaps the East), it appears historically common to have at times simply interpreted the parable as a call for faith, Baptism, and active life in the Church to include the Lord’s Supper. This doesn’t mean it is the best interpretation. In truth, pastors and theologians, Popes, Patriarchs, Bishops and councils have erred when addressing important issues. This parable was not always deemed explicitly about the Lord’s Supper, and I think it improper to present it as if it was.

To reject the garment was thought to reject God’s grace. But what is the garment explicitly? Anyone out of communion with the Church (as defined by varied dogma, councils, and cannon law; East verses West; Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant or Radical traditions all interpreted differently) was often declared doomed. To not be baptized would doom you. To not receive the Sacraments “rightly” and regularly would doom you. To not believe in approved dogma and previous interpretations of scripture (even when it might be wrong) was believed to doom you. Unfortunately, real life like the parable is never so cut and dry as our too often simplistic interpretations. God’s love is cut from a broader clothe, and I am not sure any of us humans can fully discern the scope and full intentions of God’s grace in the present.

Perhaps like Martin Luther, it is best to trust in, remember, and encourage others to believe in what we know saves us (as promised by Jesus). Through revelation, we know that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, but God might yet have mercy on whomever God wants to. If these folks are saved (shown mercy), I believe it would ultimately be because of Jesus’ sharing our lot through his life, death and resurrection. Yet with our finite wisdom, we can never really know in this life God’s full plan.

Rather than act as if we are God, proclaiming and arguing about who is or will be cast into the pit, perhaps we should be more humble. In condemning others to hell, we risk being unscriptural and walking astray ourselves. (We can address the power of the keys at another time.) Let’s not limit the power of amazing grace, when we don’t understand its full limits.

As the Church already has often done, we of varied denominations might develop policies and procedures regarding the administration of the Sacraments for good order, right theology, or for other good and loving reasons, but we need to always be prepared for grace, a gift that is often unfair and not ours to give. There might just be something more going on in the parable and with the Spirit’s activity in our lives. After all, “for now we see in a mirror, dimly” (see 1 Corinthians 13:12). Certainly, all things remain possible with God (see Matthew 26:25-26). Regarding the Lord’s Supper, God could be doing something new. It is worth talking about even as I listen to the arguments and teachings of the past.

Post Note: As with any of our theology on tap events or podcasts, please remember we are limited by both the time and format. When someone speaks authoritatively, whether me (as a Lutheran Christian), Fr. Nik (as an Episcopalian Christian), or Fr. Adam (as an Orthodox Christian), we are speaking for ourselves as best as we understand scripture and tradition from our context. We certainly can err in the moment as well. To those who listen, our teachings might unintentionally become conflated or we can appear to be in full agreement when we are not. Feel free to ask us questions after the event for further clarification. Also, keep coming back!

For those who live elsewhere, we invite you to listen to the Three Priests Walk in a Bar podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify and more.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized